Corporate growth convergence in Europe
By P. Geroski, Klaus Gugler. 2004
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8f5ca1d98f02136028d94ff9b193eabd788e5c7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- A. Segarra
- Mercedes Teruel
- Sven-Olov Daunfeldt
- Alex Coad
- Rekha Rao
- Niklas Elert
- Ning Zhang
- Marc Cowling
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age? (2013, background): “2 Research that has found a negative effect of age on firm growth includes Fizaine (1968) Evans (1987a, b), Dunne et al. (1989), Dunne and Hughes (1994), Fariñas and Moreno (2000), Correa et al. (2003) and Geroski and Gugler (2004) .”
- Firm growth and barriers to growth among small firms in India (2012, background): “Taiwanese electronics plants, Sleuwaegen and Goedhuys (2002) for Ivorian manufacturing firms, Reichstein and Dahl (2004) for Danish limited liability companies, Geroski and Gugler (2004) for large European companies, and Yasuda (2005) for Japanese manufacturing firms.”
- Clusters and entrepreneurship (2010, unknown): “However, the analysis of convergence is broader, and has historically explored firm growth based on Gibrat's Law (Geroski and Gugler, 2004; Sutton, 1997).”
- Firm Growth : a Survey (2007, unknown): “Finally, Geroski and Gugler (2004) consider the impact on firm growth of the growth of rivals, where rivals are defined as other firms in the same 3-digit industry.”
- When is Gibrat’s law a law? (2013, background): “However, some researchers (Mowery, 1983; Hart and Oulton, 1996; Ce s and Orsenigo, 2001; Lotti et al., 2003; Geroski and Gugler, 2004; and Becchetti and Trovato, 2002) still argue that Gibrats law holds for rms over a certain size, i.”
- The firm-level employment effects of innovations in high-tech US manufacturing industries (2011, result): “This is in line with results in Geroski and Gugler (2004, p. 604) , whose analysis of large European firms reveals that within-variance accounts for 60% of total growth rate variance, while between-variance accounts for the remaining 40%.”
- Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? (2016, unknown): “…there is little correlation in growth rates over time, and that there is more variation in growth rates within firms than across firms over time (Geroski and Gugler, 2004), all of which suggest that time-invariant firm-specific fixed effects do not help determine firm growth rates (Coad, 2009).”
- Jobs for Shared Prosperity: Time for Action in the Middle East and North Africa (2013, background): “For instance, Geroski and Gugler (2004) distinguish between the within- and betweenvariance of employment growth and fi nd that most of the variation (around 60 percent) is due to changes in employment growth within individual fi rms over time.”
- Determinants and Dimensions of Firm Growth (2009, unknown): “The negative effect of age on firm growth is consistent even among various countries and industries (Geroski & Gugler, 2004; Glancey, 1998; Liu, Tsou & Hammitt, 1999; Reichstein & Dahl, 2004; Robson & Bennett, 2000; Yasuda, 2005).”
- Did firm age, experience, and access to finance count? SME performance after the global financial crisis (2018, background): “…orthodoxy was that smaller firms grew faster than larger firms and that younger firms grew faster than older firms (Davidsson et al, 2010; Evans, 1987; Geroski & Gugler, 2004; Yasuda, 2005), although there were some dissenting views (largely the early US work of Davis, Haltiwanger and Shuh, 1996).”