Ideal Standards, the Self, and Flexibility of Ideals in Close Relationships

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Toward understanding understanding : The importance of feeling understood in relationships (2017, unknown): “Furthermore, perceiving that a partner understands one's negative qualities may impair relationship security when partners are thought to have high standards in that domain (Campbell, Simpson, Kashy, & Fletcher, 2001).”
Assessing Mediation in Dyadic Data Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (2011, background): “Going beyond the four standard patterns, a researcher might find a {0.5, 0.25} mediation pattern (Campbell et al., 2001).”
Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: the evolved psychology of relationship maintenance (2008, unknown): “The current research thus extends the literature on cognitive processes associated with maintaining close relationships (see also Agnew, Van Lange, Rusbult, & Langston, 1998; Campbell et al., 2001; Fletcher et al., 1999; Menzies-Toman, Lydon, & Gaines, 2005; Murray, Holmes, & Collins, 2006).”
Benevolent and Hostile Sexism and preferences for romantic partners (2009, background): “For example, Campbell et al. (2001) found that people who possessed more inflexible standards judged their partner and relationship more harshly when their partner failed to live up to their standards.”