Interlaboratory Comparison of Hygric Properties of Porous Building Materials

By Staf Roels, Jan Carmeliet, H. Hens, O. Adan, H. Brocken, R. Černý, Z. Pavlík, C. Hall, K. Kumaran, L. Pel and 1 more. 2004

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering, Earth-Surface Processes

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8e9b6b082d5d07ca519ac829404682c2f0ba907

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Výborný

Citations in the corpus

• Advanced computational modelling for drying processes – A review (2014, unknown): “Additional variability is introduced by the measurement accuracy of the test setup (experimental uncertainty) and differences in measuring equipment, measurement protocol and data postprocessing between different laboratories [207–210].”
• Properties of high performance concrete containing fine-ground ceramics as supplementary cementitious material (2012, methodology): “The dry-cup method was employed in the measurement of water vapor transport properties [21].”
• Hygric, thermal and durability properties of autoclaved aerated concrete (2013, methodology): “Water adsorption isotherms were measured using the desiccators’ method [29].”