The evolution of dispersal distance in spatially-structured populations

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modelling and analysing evolution of dispersal in populations at expanding range boundaries (2007, background): “…1997; Travis & Dytham, 1999, 2002; Heino & Hanski, 2001 ) and empirical ( Berwaerts et al. , 1998; Thomas et al. , 1998a; Hill et al. , 1999a; Norberg & Leimar, 2002; Mennechez et al. , 2003; Merckx et al. , 2003; Hanski et al. , 2004 ) studies show that habitat fragmentation affects the…”
Advances in our understanding of mammalian sex‐biased dispersal (2007, background): “The distribution of dispersal distances should be very informative for understanding evolutionary causes of dispersal (Murrell et al .”
Young flying squirrels (Pteromys volans) dispersing in fragmented forests (2004, background): “…dispersal distance before the onset of dispersal could include social structure, landscape structure within natal home range (Kenward et al., 2001; Loew, 1999; Lurz et al., 1997; Wauters and Dhondt, 1993; Wauters et al., 1994), and genetic factors (Johnson and Gaines, 1990; Murrel et al., 2002).”
Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics (2005, background): “…process typically lack a great deal of realism (Travis & French, 2000; Goodwin, 2003), and do not incorporate condition-dependent dispersal strategies (e.g. Gadgil, 1971; Hastings, 1983; Holt, 1985; Hanski, 1994; Hanski & Thomas, 1994; Doebeli, 1995; Travis & Dytham, 1999; Murrell et al., 2002).”