Knowledge-Defined Networking

By A. Mestres, Alberto Rodríguez-Natal, Josep Carner, Pere Barlet-Ros, Eduard Alarcón, Marc Solé, Victor Muntés, D. Meyer, Sharon Barkai, Mike J. Hibbett and 10 more. Computer communication review, 2016

353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The research community has considered in the past the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques to control and operate networks. A notable example is the Knowledge Plane proposed by D.Clark et al. However, such techniques have not been extensively prototyped or deployed in the field yet. In this paper, we explore the reasons for the lack of adoption and posit that the rise of two recent paradigms: Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Analytics (NA), will facilitate the adoption of AI techniques in the context of network operation and control. We describe a new paradigm that accommodates and exploits SDN, NA and AI, and provide use-cases that illustrate its applicability and benefits. We also present simple experimental results that support, for some relevant use-cases, its feasibility. We refer to this new paradigm as Knowledge-Defined Networking (KDN).

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8e439c2ec02481303da70cd5187e224bcb770b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

  1. Nei Kato
  2. Fengxiao Tang
  3. Bomin Mao
  4. Zubair Muhammad Fadlullah
  5. Madhusanka Liyanage
  6. Pawani Porambage
  7. Mika E. Ylianttila
  8. Tao Huang

In Hardware and Architecture

  1. Nei Kato
  2. Zubair Muhammad Fadlullah

Citations in the corpus