Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge

By Bjørn T. Asheim, Arne Isaksen. 2002

1,323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8ba2a35b166dcbf2e59f3eee999ca3d6c22b25a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

Regional Innovation Systems in Central and Eastern Europe: Determinants, Organizers and Alignments (2002, background): “Second, the region itself does not determine much of what happens within it. The determinants of the systems of innovation are of a multilevel character and hence RIS are also often of the multilevel nature (see Asheim and Isaksen, 1999 for three Norwegian regions).”
Complementary interregional linkages and Smart Specialisation: an empirical study on European regions (2020, background): “…because scholars have claimed for long that extra-regional linkages are crucial for regional development and prevent regions from ending up in a lock-in situation (e.g., Asheim & Isaksen, 2002; Bathelt et al., 2004; Camagni, 1991; Giuliani & Bell, 2005; Hassink, 2005; Vicente et al., 2011).”
Social Capital and the Resource-Based View of the Firm (2009, background): “…effects on factors such as corporate innovation (Fountain 1998), interfirm resource exchange (Tsai and Ghoshal 1998), regional production networks (Asheim and Isaksen 2002), mobilization of finance (Uzzi 1999), collective goal orientation and shared trust (Leana and van Buren 1999),…”
What Matters more for the Decision to Move: Jobs versus Amenities (2010, background): “Capitalist production in the Western world has become increasingly dependent on the creation and exploitation of knowledge to stimulate processes of innovation (Asheim and Isaksen, 2002; Lundvall, 1992).”
The path- and place-dependent nature of scientific knowledge production in biotech 1986-2008 (2014, background): “Being exposed to extra-regional knowledge is often considered crucial in the literature, because it brings new variety into the region (Asheim and Isaksen, 2002; Boschma and Iammarino, 2009).”
The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks (2010, neutral): “Tacit knowledge is bound to the person that possesses the knowledge and a transfer of this knowledge requires personal face-to-face contact (Teece 1981; von Hippel 1994; Asheim and Isaken 2002 ).”
An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives (2005, background): “Learning dynamics and the employment of informal channels for the exchange of tacit and ‘sticky’ codified knowledge are in fact embedded in distinct environments of interactions among various actors and organizations, the sharing of common attitudes, habits and conventions, and institutional setting”
Collaboration Intensity and Regional Innovation Efficiency in Germany—A Conditional Efficiency Approach (2012, methodology): “Numerous case studies show that intensive collaboration among regional organizations fosters their innovation performance (Saxenian, 1998 ; Asheim and Isaksen, 2002 ; Cainelli et al.”