Multiple effects of weather on the starvation and predation risk trade‐off in choice of feeding location in Redshanks

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Predation in bird populations (2011, background): “…Tringa totanus may avoid 26% (Cresswell et al. 2010) and adults 100% (Cresswell 1994) of the most profitable habitat to avoid attacks by Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, unless severe-weather-induced starvation risk forces them to feed in risky areas (Yasue et al. 2003; Cresswell and Whitfield 2008).”
Tradeoffs between food abundance and predation danger in spatial usage of a stopover site by western sandpipers, Calidris mauri (2006, background): “Shorebirds balance the benefits of feeding with the costs of predation by using sites with low energy-intake rates in order to gain safety from predators (Cresswell 1994a, Ydenberg et al. 2002, Yasué et al. 2003), furthermore they can alter their usage within a site to optimize this tradeoff.”
Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior (2005, background): “Similarly, redshanks may feed in low predation risk areas until increased energy demands and declining food supply during midwinter forces them to feed in highrisk areas (Yasué et al., 2003).”