Conditional Neural Fields
By Jian Peng, Liefeng Bo, Jinbo Xu. 2009
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Jianfeng Gao
- Yoav Goldberg
- Noah A. Smith
- Christopher D. Manning
- Mohit Bansal
- Graham Neubig
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Chris Dyer
Citations in the corpus
- Structured Attention Networks (2017, background): “…applications, most notably in seminal work on graph transformers (LeCun et al., 1998), key work on NLP (Collobert et al., 2011), and in many other areas (Peng et al., 2009; Do & Arti´eres, 2010; Jaderberg et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015; Durrett & Klein, 2015; Lample et al., 2016, inter alia ).”
- Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks (2015, neutral): “[45] used a modified version of CRFs.”
- Fully Connected Deep Structured Networks (2015, background): “More recently [5, 27, 22, 6, 28, 25] incorporate non-linearities into unary potentials but generally assume exact inference to be tractable.”
- Learning Deep Structured Models (2014, background): “Conditional Neural Fields [21] extend Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) by augmenting the unary feature using a ‘gate function’ which combines different features in a non-linear manner.”
- Deep Supervised and Convolutional Generative Stochastic Network for Protein Secondary Structure Prediction (2014, background): “Other developments include better capturing spatial dependencies us-ing bidirectional recurrent neural networks (BRNN) (Baldi et al., 1999; Pollastri et al., 2002), probabilistic graphical models (Schmidler et al., 2000; Chu et al., 2004; van der Maaten et al., 2011), or combination of neural networ”
- MRFalign: Protein Homology Detection through Alignment of Markov Random Fields (2014, methodology): “be placed here) Node alignment potential. Given an alignment path, its node alignment potential is the accumulative potential of all the vertices in the path. We use a Conditional Neural Fields (CNF) [40] method, which is very similar to what is described in the protein threading paper [41], to esti”
- OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networks (2017, background): “…a strong push to further incorporate structured prediction methods like conditional random fields as the “last layer” of a deep network architecture (Peng et al., 2009; Zheng et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2015) as well as in deeper energy-based architectures (Belanger & McCallum, 2016; Belanger et…”
- Globally Normalized Transition-Based Neural Networks (2016, methodology): “Smith and Johnson (2007) cite Michael Collins as the source of the example underlying the proof.”
- Input Convex Neural Networks (2016, background): “In recent years, there has been a strong push to further incorporate structured prediction methods like conditional random fields as the “last layer” of a deep network architecture (Peng et al., 2009; Zheng et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2015).”
- Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server (2012, methodology): “The secondary structure prediction module is based on a CNF model 28 developed by Wang et al 47 .”
- A tutorial survey of architectures, algorithms, and applications for deep learning (2014, background): “Many of the discriminative techniques in signal and information processing apply to shallow architectures such as HMMs (e.g., [87–94]) or CRFs (e.g., [95–100]).”
- Convolutional neural network based triangular CRF for joint intent detection and slot filling (2013, methodology): “In [8, 9], conditional neural field and neural CRF were introduced which combined the NN based feature learning and the CRF models.”
- Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networks (2017, background): “Recently, they have shown state-of-the-art results in segmentation [15, 16] when combined with deep neural networks [17, 18, 19].”
- Effect of Non-linear Deep Architecture in Sequence Labeling (2013, methodology): “It was termed Conditional Neural Fields by Peng et al. (2009), and later Neural Conditional Random Fields by Do and Artieres (2010).”
- Protein Homology Detection Through Alignment of Markov Random Fields (2015, methodology): “We use a Conditional Neural Fields (CNF) [12] method to develop such a node alignment potential, using a procedure very similar to what is described in the protein threading paper [13, 14].”
- Deep neural network models for computational histopathology: A survey (2019, methodology): “These techniques have been extensively used in computer vision tasks for sequence labeling (Artieres et al., 2010; Peng et al., 2009) and semantic image segmentation problems (Chen et al.”
- Segmental Recurrent Neural Networks (2015, methodology): “Finally, using neural networks to provide local features in conditional random field models has also been proposed for sequential models (Peng et al., 2009) and tree-structured models (Durrett & Klein, 2015).”