Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems
By K. Cox, Leonard J. Schoppa. 2002
216 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8a05a4b9b8a701fb587ef946084becab52185e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Going It Alone? Strategic Entry under Mixed Electoral Rules (2005, background): “…candidate placement in single-member districts is found to consistently improve a party’s PR performance in a variety of highly diverse cases such as Russia, Japan, Lithuania, Ukraine, Germany, New Zealand, and Italy (Herron and Nishikawa 2001, Cox and Schoppa 2002; Ferrara 2003a; Golosov 2003).”
- Mixed electoral systems and electoral system effects: controlled comparison and cross-national analysis (2004, background): “Such an approach not only produces fresh insights on the effects of PR and SMD elections; but also explores the extent to which ‘‘contamination’’—the presence of PR balloting altering SMD politics and SMD balloting affecting PR—shapes the effects of electoral rules in mixed systems (see Herron and N”
- Ticket-splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules: Evidence from Germany (2007, background): “16. One likely consequence of these contamination effects is that more straight-ticket voting is observed ( Cox & Schoppa 2002 ) than otherwise expected.”