BIOSORPTION OF HEAVY METALS
By N. Ahalya, T. Ramachandra, R. Kanamadi. 2003
3,703 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f89f4bc6fad2d8906924ba98438e1f4a5d2c6239
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Geoffrey M. Gadd
- M. Fomina
- K. Vijayaraghavan
- M. S. Khan
- Jianlong Wang
- Y. Yun
- Mohammad Oves
- H. Sehaqui
Citations in the corpus
- Biosorption of chromium(III) by Sargassum sp. biomass (2002, background): “Studies about the technological aspects of the metal removal by algae are scarce (Volesky and Holan, 1995).”
- Heavy Metal Phytoremediation from Aquatic Ecosystems with Special Reference to Macrophytes (2009, background): “A review of literature shows that heavy metals can be removed by inexpensive biological materials, such as algae, fungi, and bacteria ( Ho et al, 2002 ; Kaewsarn, 2002 ; Vasudevan et al, 2001 ; Volesky & Holan, 1995 ).”
- Bacterial biosorbents and biosorption. (2008, methodology): “Of the different biological methods, bioaccumulation and biosorption have been demonstrated to possess good potential to replace conventional methods for the removal of dyes/metals (Volesky and Holan, 1995; Malik, 2004).”
- Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation. (2010, unknown): “Biosorption is a physico-chemical process, simply defined as ‘the removal of substances from solution by biological material’; it is a property of both living and dead organisms (and their components), and has been heralded as a promising biotechnology for removal (and/or recovery) of metals, radion”
- Simultaneous adsorption of chromium(VI) and phenol on natural red clay modified by HDTMA (2012, background): “Its advantages include high efficiency, easy handling, high selectivity, lower operating costs, easy regeneration of adsorbent, and minimized production of chemical or biological sludge [6].”
- Metal bioremediation through growing cells. (2004, background): “Further, the capacities of these microorganisms to accumulate an ample range of metal species have also been described (Volesky, 1994; Fourest et al., 1994; Volesky and Holan, 1995).”
- Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater. (2007, background): “Seaweed, mold, bacteria, crab shells and yeast are among the different kinds of biomass, which have been tested for metal biosorption or removal (Volesky and Holan, 1995).”
- Microalgae - A promising tool for heavy metal remediation. (2015, methodology): “However, most conventional techniques involved in HM remediation provide incomplete metal removal (Volesky, 1990), require large amounts of reagents and energy (Ahalya et al., 2003), have limited tolerance to pH change (Ahluwalia and Goyal, 2007), have moderate or no metal selectivity (Antunes et al”
- Tolerance and phytoaccumulation of Chromium by three Azolla species (2006, background): “Also, conventional chemical methods for removal of toxic metals are ineffective when levels of metals in wastewaters are very low (between 10– 100 l gm l )1 ) ( Volesky 1990 ).”
- Biosorption of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution and electroplating wastewater using fungal biomass (2008, background): “[7] B.”
- Biosorption of chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions by the husk of Bengal gram (Cicer arientinum) (2005, methodology): “Efficient and environment friendly methods are thus needed to be developed to reduce heavy metal content In this context, considerable attention has been focused in recent years upon the field of biosorption for the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous effluents (Volesky and Holan, 1995).”