A front-tracking method for the computations of multiphase flow

By Grétar Tryggvason, Bernard Bunner, Asghar Esmaeeli, Damir Juric, Nabeel Z. Al-Rawahi, W. Tauber, Jaehoon Han, S. Nas, Y. Jan. 2001

2,259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f86ac68eba685c5562837de229b3e6c1eaa8a9ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

Citations in the corpus

Modelling two-phase flow in porous media at the pore scale using the volume-of-fluid method (2012, methodology): “[38] report that the problem is less pronounced in their marker method, where K appears to be around 10 5 [39].”
Numerical Models of Surface Tension (2018, methodology): “In the context of front-tracking techniques, the generalisation of (1) to three dimensions (Weatherburn 1927) has been used by Tryggvason et al. (2001) to define a globallyconservative interfacial force.”
Modeling three-dimensional multiphase flow using a level contour reconstruction method for front tracking without connectivity (2002, methodology): “These currents are known to plague VOF [2, 13] and to a much lesser extent front tracking methods [27, 28].”
A surfactant-conserving volume-of-fluid method for interfacial flows with insoluble surfactant (2004, neutral): “see [18–22]), level set (e.”
Lattice Boltzmann equation model for multi-component multi-phase flow with high density ratios (2013, methodology): “The most commonly used front-tracking methods are the boundary-fitted grid method [6], Tryggvassion’s hybrid method [7], and the Boundary Element Method (BEM) [8].”
Experimental and computational investigation of vertical downflow condensation (2015, methodology): “[38] used the combined Eulerian–Lagrangian perspective, which is called the front tracking method.”
On the theory and computation of surface tension: the elimination of parasitic currents through energy conservation in the second-gradient method (2002, methodology): “The parasitic currents seem to occur despite differences in methods, such as SURFER and continuum-surface-force methods (CSF) [2], used with the volume-of-fluid (VOF) method, the front-tracking method [ 18 ], and the second-gradient method [9].”
Three-dimensional adaptive domain remeshing, implicit domain meshing, and applications to free and moving boundary problems (2014, methodology): “As parts of the first class, Lagrangian methods bring into play an exact mesh of the domain(s), which is updated in the course of the iterative process [30]; front-tracking formulations [26,45] feature a reconstruction of the evolving boundary (or interface), which is used in the resolution of the p”
USING THE PARTICLE LEVEL SET METHOD AND A SECOND ORDER ACCURATE PRESSURE BOUNDARY CONDITION FOR FREE SURFACE FLOWS (2003, methodology): “These spurious velocities have been analyzed for VOF [23] [24], front tracking [25] [26] [27], and level set [11] methods.”
A discontinuous‐Galerkin‐based immersed boundary method (2008, methodology): “It can be either explicit, with numerical particles distributed over the boundary to determine its location[75, 73, 63], or implicit, defined by a volumetric quantity such as a volume-of-fluid field (as in VOF methods [32, 57, 56, 25]) or as a level set function (as in level-set methods [52, 59, 60,”