Evaluation of serial and parallel multibiometric systems under spoofing attacks

By Zahid Akhtar, Giorgio Fumera, Gian Luca Marcialis, Fabio Roli. 2012

72 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Information Systems, Signal Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Information Systems

In Signal Processing

Citations in the corpus

Robust multimodal face and fingerprint fusion in the presence of spoofing attacks (2016, background): “As in many other approaches assessing face and fingerprint fusion [18,35], also this work builds on a chimeric dataset pairing face and fingerprints originally originating from different people.”
Towards anomaly detection for increased security in multibiometric systems: Spoofing-resistant 1-median fusion eliminating outliers (2014, background): “[2] conducted the first study to examine the vulnerability of both parallel and serial fusion in bimodal (face and fingerprint) configuration against spoofing attacks.”
Spoofing and countermeasures for speaker verification: A survey (2015, background): “We note, however, that Rodriques et al. (2009) and Akhtar et al. (2012) suggests it might suffice to spoof only one modality (or sub-system) under a score fusion setting in the case where the spoofing of a single, significantly weighted sub-system is particularly effective.”
Image Quality Assessment for Fake Biometric Detection: Application to Iris, Fingerprint, and Face Recognition (2014, background): “…the so-called direct or spooﬁng attacks have motivated the biometric community to study the vulnerabilities against this type of fraudulent actions in modalities such as the iris [2], the ﬁngerprint [17], the face [13], the signature [18], or even the gait [19] and multimodal approaches [20].”
Biometric Antispoofing Methods: A Survey in Face Recognition (2014, background): “, circumventing a multibiometric system implies breaking all unimodal modules) has already been shown to be untrue as, in many cases, bypassing just one of the unimodal subsystems is enough to gain access to the complete application [75], [85]–[88].”
Anti-spoofing in Action: Joint Operation with a Verification System (2013, background): “However, in many cases spoofing only one modality can be enough, as discussed in [21], [13], [1].”