Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds

By Friedemann Pulvermüller, M. Huss, Ferath Kherif, Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín, Olaf Hauk, Yury Shtyrov. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006

694 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f84663b1a87946f979a6f552f2be293333e03f09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Matthew H. Davis
2. David Poeppel
3. Ingrid S. Johnsrude
4. Thomas G. Bever
5. M. Gareth Gaskell
6. Bruno Galantucci
7. Gregory Hickok
8. Peter Hagoort

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Matthew H. Davis
2. Ingrid S. Johnsrude
3. Gregory Hickok
4. David Poeppel
5. Thomas G. Bever
6. M. Gareth Gaskell
7. Micha Elsner
8. Bruno Galantucci

In Social Psychology

1. David Poeppel
2. Thomas G. Bever
3. Carol A. Fowler
4. Bruno Galantucci
5. Ingrid S. Johnsrude
6. Michael T. Turvey
7. Matthew H. Davis
8. Gregory Hickok

Citations in the corpus

• Analysis by Synthesis: A (Re-)Emerging Program of Research for Language and Vision (2010, methodology): “Using electrophysiological techniques, such as EEG and MEG, other investigators (e.g., Pulvermüller et al. 2006; see review by Pulvermüller & Fadiga 2010) have shown that electrophysiological responses localized to motor areas are active remarkably early in the processing stream (say within 200…”
• The motor theory of speech perception reviewed (2006, background): “Complementarily, two fMRI studies (Pulvermüller et al., 2006; S. M. Wilson, Saygin, Sereno, & Iacoboni, 2004) demonstrated that there is overlap between the cortical areas active during speech production and those active during passive listening to speech.”
• How do forward models work? And why would you want them? (2013, neutral): “& Shtyrov, Y. (2006) Language outside the focus of attention: the”
• Measuring the perceptual availability of phonological features during language acquisition using unsupervised binary stochastic autoencoders (2019, background): “…symbiotically through a sensorimotor loop relating acoustic perception and articulator movements (Houde and Jordan, 1998; Fadiga et al., 2002; Watkins et al., 2003; Wilson et al., 2004; Pulvermüller et al., 2006; Kröger et al., 2009; Bolhuis et al., 2010; Kröger and Cao, 2015; Bekolay, 2016).”
• Learning and Consolidation of Novel Spoken Words (2009, background): “shown that left frontal and premotor regions are engaged in phonological processing of spoken language if motoric processes are not concurrently engaged for overt decisions (Meister, Wilson, Deblieck, Wu, & Iacoboni, 2007; Pulvermuller et al., 2006; Wilson, Saygin, Sereno, & Iacoboni, 2004; Watkins,”
• Brain regions recruited for the effortful comprehension of noise-vocoded words (2012, background): “This theory is currently experiencing a revival of interest in response to mounting evidence from functional imaging (eg, Pulvermuller et al, 2006 ; Wilson, Saygin, Sereno, & Iacoboni, 2004 ) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) (Fadiga, Craighero, Buccino, & Rizzolatti, 2002 ; K.”