SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer
By M. Moran, S. Schnitt, A. Giuliano, J. Harris, S. Khan, J. Horton, S. Klimberg, M. Chávez-MacGregor, G. Freedman, N. Houssami and 2 more. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2014
603 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Summary Changes in the management of breast cancer over time have led to decreased rates of IBTR. The 2013 SSO/ASTRO guidelines on margins in breast-conserving surgery for invasive cancer are summarized in this document.
Subfields: Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f84243d119fbee9b6a72e3af550e42709bcc14c6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cancer Research
Citations in the corpus
- Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. (2015, background): “There is no general consensus on what is considered an adequate margin; however, circumferential margins <2 mm are considered less adequate and no DCIS on inked margins is a minimal requirement [47].”
- Awareness and current knowledge of breast cancer (2017, background): “However stage 2B describes that the tumor could be larger than 5 cm but can’t reach to the axillary lymph nodes [103].”
- A review of clinical photoacoustic imaging: Current and future trends (2019, background): “As no tumor on ink for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 2mm for DCIS are the acceptable surgical margins according to the Society of Surgical Oncology [73,74], it can be considered that PAI was observed to have 100 % specificity as well.”