Assembling Risk and the Restructuring of Penal Control

By Paula Maurutto, Kelly Hannah-Moffat. 2006

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Madars Virza
2. Karthik Dinakar
3. Chelsea Barabas
4. Joichi Ito
5. Jonathan L. Zittrain
6. Kelly Hannah-Moffat
7. Momin M. Malik

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Madars Virza
2. Karthik Dinakar
3. Chelsea Barabas
4. Joichi Ito
5. Jonathan L. Zittrain
6. Kelly Hannah-Moffat
7. Momin M. Malik

Citations in the corpus

• Interventions over Predictions: Reframing the Ethical Debate for Actuarial Risk Assessment (2017, methodology): “ assessment focused almost exclusively on static historical factors, such as age and criminal history.Suchfactorswereconsidereddesirablebecausetheywereperceived as bothobjective and highly predictive [51]. This marked a subtleshiftinthevaluesandgoalsriskassessments weredesigned to support, away from”
• Actuarial Sentencing: An “Unsettled” Proposition (2013, methodology): “Clearly, corrections organizations select the risk technologies that “fit” their agency’s vision and mission (Maurutto and Hannah-Moffat, 2006; 2003).”