Topology optimization for minimum stress design with the homogenization method
By Grégoire Allaire, François Jouve, H. Maillot. 2004
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f83b26802ce883129da72a550c2875a3328eb87b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Ole Sigmund
- Martin P. Bendsøe
- Ramana V. Grandhi
- Joshua D. Deaton
- Antonio André Novotny
- Samuel Amstutz
- Daniel A. Tortorelli
- Hélio Emmendoerfer
In Mechanics of Materials
- Ole Sigmund
- Martin P. Bendsøe
- Antonio André Novotny
- Samuel Amstutz
- E. A. Souza Neto
- T. Bruns
- Hélio Emmendoerfer
- Luca Dede'
Citations in the corpus
- Isogeometric Analysis for Topology Optimization with a Phase Field Model (2012, methodology): “In this framework a possible approach is the homogenization method [4], for which the macroscopic properties of the material are deduced from the microscopic properties of the porous material represented by the density function; the first numerical approximation for an homogenized material was prese”
- Topological optimization of structures subject to Von Mises stress constraints (2010, background): “This is in contrast with the existing literature on the topic, where either dual methods are implemented [14, 16, 19, 31], with the well-known difficulties related to the irregularity of the Lagrange multiplier, or a simple power law penalization is considered [3, 4], generally leading to unfeasible”
- Minimum stress optimal design with the level set method. (2008, methodology): “There are relatively fewer papers on this topic in the context of topology optimization, based either on the homogenization method, SIMP or phase-(cid:12)eld method, see [5], [17], [16], [23], [39].”
- Topology Optimization (2009, methodology): “In general, well-performing designs were found in the range P ∈ [16,28].”
- Dynamic Response Topology Optimization in the Time Domain Using Equivalent Static Loads (2012, background): “Various objective functions and constraints have been widely studied: minimization of compliance [13, 14]; eigenvalues and vibration [15, 16]; buckling load [17, 18]; stress constraints [19-21]; damage and impact [22]; multiobjective functions [23].”
- Topological derivative-based topology optimization of structures subject to Drucker–Prager stress constraints (2012, methodology): “Such methods have been widely applied with success to problems such as compliance minimization [10] but, despite its fundamental importance in engineering design, only a relatively small number of publications appear to deal with the incorporation of local (point-wise) stress constraints [2, 3, 11, ”
- Stress-based topology optimization for continua (2010, background): “Hence, we consider neither composite nor functionally graded materials (Lipton 2002; Stump et al. 2007; Allaire et al. 2004).”
- Simultaneous design of components layout and supporting structures using coupled shape and topology optimization technique (2008, methodology): “Meanwhile, effective approaches like homogenization-based method (Bendsøe and Kikuchi 1988; Allaire et al. 2004), solid isotropic material with penalization model (Bendsøe 1989; Zhou and Rozvany 1991), evolutionary method (Xie and Steven 1997), etc. have been proposed so far.”
- Sequential integer programming methods for stress constrained topology optimization (2007, methodology): “Also in Allaire et al. (2004) the problem is initially kept infinite dimensional, and a minimum stress problem is treated by the use of the homogenization method, see e.g.”
- Topology optimization for minimum mass design considering local failure constraints and contact boundary conditions (2006, background): “A different approach to defining this effective stress is given in Allaire et al. (2004) in the context of homogenized microstructures.”
- A level set approach for topology optimization with local stress constraints (2014, methodology): “On the other hand, the work in [5] also extended the homogenization method to treat problems involving stress but to objective functions corresponding to minimum stress design subject to volume constraint.”
- Sensitivity analysis with the modified Heaviside function for the optimal layout design of multi-component systems (2012, unknown): “were established [2–7].”