From Premise to Practice: a Critical Assessment of Integrated Water Resources Management and Adaptive Management Approaches in the Water Sector
By W. Medema, B. McIntosh, Paul Jeffrey. 2008
352 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The complexity of natural resource use processes and dynamics is now well accepted and described in theories ranging across the sciences from ecology to economics. Based upon these theories, management frameworks have been developed within the research community to cope with complexity and improve natural resource management outcomes. Two notable frameworks, Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) and Adaptive Management (AM) have been developed within the domain of water resource management over the past thirty or so years. Such frameworks provide testable statements about how best to organise knowledge production and use to facilitate the realisation of desirable outcomes including sustainable resource use. However evidence for the success of IWRM and AM is mixed and they have come under criticism recently as failing to provide promised benefits. This paper critically reviews the claims made for IWRM and AM against evidence from their implementation and explores whether or not criticisms are rooted in problems encountered during the translation from research to practice. To achieve this we review the main issues that challenge the implementation of both frameworks. More specifically, we analyse the various definitions and descriptions of IWRM and AM. Our findings suggest that similar issues have affected the lack of success that practitioners have experienced throughout the implementation process for both frameworks. These findings are discussed in the context of the broader societal challenge of effective translation of research into practice, science into policy and ambition into achievement.
Subfields: Ocean Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f799050fd341f32842d48b9117d237809744b16c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ocean Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Integrated and Adaptive Management of Water Resources: Tensions, Legacies, and the Next Best Thing (2011, background): “In a thorough review article comparing IWRM and AM in the water sector, Medema et al. (2008) argue that because these theoretical frameworks are difficult to translate into practice, they mostly fail to provide successful examples of implementation.”
- Maturing the New Water Management Paradigm: Progressing from Aspiration to Practice (2011, background): “Turning the argument for how enquiry and intervention should proceed into evidence and management tools to support and implement policy is a far from trivial activity (see Medema et al. 2008 for an exposition on this in the context of water management).”
- Adaptive management of biological systems: A review (2013, methodology): “…has not been applied to the AM literature before, despite a number of qualitative reviews or essays (Fessehazion et al., 2011; Heinimann, 2010; Keith et al., 2011; Loeb et al., 1998; Lyons et al., 2008; Medema et al., 2008; Pahl-Wostl et al., 2007; Shea et al., 2002; Thom, 2000; Wilhere, 2002).”