Why Do Firms Use Private Equity to Opt Out of Public Markets
By Sreedhar T. Bharath, Amy K. Dittmar. 2010
221 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f82b4cf7ddaf803f50b01a0c661ba0768e423309
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Finance
Citations in the corpus
- Media Coverage and the Cost of Debt (2019, unknown): “We then focus on IPOs of firms that initially incorporate in the past 10 years prior to the IPO date in an attempt to rule out long-lived private firms, spin-offs, carve-outs, and reverse leveraged buyouts (LBOs) (Cao and Lerner (2009), Bharath and Dittmar (2010)).”
- Venture Capital and Other Private Equity: A Survey (2011, unknown): “43 Also see Black and Gilson (1998), Allen and Song (2003), Cumming and Johan (2008) and Cao et al.”
- Learning from History: Volatility and Financial Crises (2016, background): “Then, how “high” is an AUROC of 76%? For comparison, Bharath and Dittmar’s (2010) model on which firms go private delivers an AUROC of 78%, and Berge and Jorda (2011) study the predictive ability of various indicators on economic turning points and report AUROC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.98. In t”
- The U.S. Listing Gap (2016, unknown): “…Brian Baugh, Andrei Gonçalves, Alan Kwan, and Xiaofei Zhao for excellent research assistance, to Francois DeGeorge, Gustavo Grullon, Charles Jones, Crocker Liu, Hamid Mehran, Vesa Puttonen, Jay Ritter, and Scott Yonker for valuable comments, and to Frank Hatheway (NASDAQ) for a useful conversation.”
- Determinants of Corporate Cash Policy: Insights from Private Firms (2013, unknown): “This is a different comparison than examining firms at the time they make the decision to go public (or private) and these differences likely explain the differences in our findings from Bharath and Dittmar (2010).”