Using X-ray computed tomography in hydrology: systems, resolutions, and limitations

By D. Wildenschild, C. Vaz, Mark Rivers, D. Rikard, B. Christensen. 2002

390 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f82101ab9d16e730ca77e7950e51978f71489755

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Mechanics of Materials

In Ocean Engineering

Citations in the corpus

3D image-based characterization of fluid displacement in a Berea core (2007, background): “Since the late 1990s, the introduction of X-ray absorbent dopants to provide contrast between fluids has enabled non-destructive XCMT studies [35,36,46] of the 3D distribution of fluids in the pores.”
Three-dimensional quantification of intra-aggregate pore-space features using synchrotron-radiation-based microtomography (2008, background): “Details on different tomography techniques and error sources are discussed in Wildenschild et al. (2002) , Stock (1999) and Ketcham and Carlson (2001).”
Comparison of a Lattice‐Boltzmann Model, a Full‐Morphology Model, and a Pore Network Model for Determining Capillary Pressure–Saturation Relationships (2005, background): “…implies that the samreview on applications of X-ray tomography in hydrol-ple is large enough to allow a meaningful average over ogy was given by Wildenschild et al. (2002).the microscopic heterogeneities at the pore scale in the Since the constitutive relations including all multi-sense of a…”
Quantitative Analysis of Flow Processes in a Sand Using Synchrotron‐Based X‐ray Microtomography (2005, methodology): “We refer to Wildenschild et al. (2002) for a schematic of the general beam-line setup.”
Effects of vegetation restoration on soil aggregate microstructure quantified with synchrotron-based micro-computed tomography (2012, methodology): “Micro-CT, especially SR-mCT, has the advantage of providing high resolution images with best signal to noise ratios and strong attenuation contrast at very fast scanning speed, and therefore is an excellent tool for studying soil aggregate microstructure (Wildenschild et al., 2002; Udawatta et al., ”
In Situ Root System Architecture Extraction from Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Water Uptake Modeling (2013, methodology): “…high resolution have been adapted for root–soil interaction research. h ese are x-ray tomography, which probes the physical density of the medium (Wildenschild et al., 2002), neutron tomography (Esser et al., 2010), x-ray microcomputed tomography (Mairhofer et al., 2012), and MRI (Pohlmeier et…”