Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
By R. Brower, P. Lanken, N. MacIntyre, Michael A. Matthay, A. Morris, M. Ancukiewicz, D. Schoenfeld, B. Thompson. New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
2,278 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f81f475919bde402ce0212a0cef724eca502100c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
In Epidemiology
In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury (2014, methodology): “, the ALVEOLI study) performed by the ARDS Network [14] was unable to fi nd differences in the clinical outcomes of ARDS patients who were assigned to either the higher PEEP strategy (13.”
- Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume (2005, background): “(ALI) and ARDS, who should be ventilated with low tidal volumes [15, 16].”