Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses

By V. Varma, Scott E. Field, Mark A. Scheel, Jonathan Blackman, Davide Gerosa, L. Stein, Lawrence E. Kidder, Harald P. Pfeiffer. Physical Review Research, 2019

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Only numerical relativity simulations can capture the full complexities of binary black hole mergers. These simulations, however, are prohibitively expensive for direct data analysis applications such as parameter estimation. We present two new fast and accurate surrogate models for the outputs of these simulations: the first model, NRSur7dq4, predicts the gravitational waveform and the second model, \RemnantModel, predicts the properties of the remnant black hole. These models extend previous 7-dimensional, non-eccentric precessing models to higher mass ratios, and have been trained against 1528 simulations with mass ratios $q\leq4$ and spin magnitudes $\chi_1,\chi_2 \leq 0.8$, with generic spin directions. The waveform model, NRSur7dq4, which begins about 20 orbits before merger, includes all $\ell \leq 4$ spin-weighted spherical harmonic modes, as well as the precession frame dynamics and spin evolution of the black holes. The final black hole model, \RemnantModel, models the mass, spin, and recoil kick velocity of the remnant black hole. In their training parameter range, both models are shown to be more accurate than existing models by at least an order of magnitude, with errors comparable to the estimated errors in the numerical relativity simulations. We also show that the surrogate models work well even when extrapolated outside their training parameter space range, up to mass ratios $q=6$.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8143348d3c4fdfe5d854a102c7a0ebbd01e75fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Michela Mapelli
  2. D. Holz
  3. Mario Spera
  4. Maya Fishbach
  5. N. Giacobbo
  6. Ilya Mandel
  7. T. Bulik
  8. R. O’Shaughnessy

Citations in the corpus