Redundant Multiscale Transforms and Their Application for Morphological Component Separation
By Jean-Luc Starck, Michael Elad, David L. Donoho. 2004
431 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7ea3fe2ed857119c2c9614a5d07521fb7b7bf62
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Felix J. Herrmann
- Michael Elad
- David L. Donoho
- E.J. Candes
- Gilles Hennenfent
- Jean-Luc Starck
- Mohamed-Jalal Fadili
- Stephen P. Boyd
In Media Technology
- Michael Elad
- David L. Donoho
- Mohamed-Jalal Fadili
- Jean-Luc Starck
- Felix J. Herrmann
- Gilles Hennenfent
- E.J. Candes
- Bo Zhang
Citations in the corpus
- Sparsity- and continuity-promoting seismic image recovery with curvelet frames (2008, methodology): “The above nonlinear optimization problem (P� ) is solved with a cooling method (see, e.g., [ 39 ]).”
- Simultaneous cartoon and texture image inpainting using morphological component analysis (MCA) (2005, methodology): “As can be seen, by replacing the mask matrix by the identity operator we obtain the very same algorithm as proposed in [25, 26 ] for the task of image decomposition.”
- Inpainting and Zooming Using Sparse Representations (2009, methodology): “This algorithm is a direct extension of the MCA (Morphological Component Analysis), designed for the separation of an image into different semantic components [30, 31 ].”
- Non-parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames (2008, methodology): “If after these iterations the condition ‖y −Ax̃λ‖2 ≤ is not met, the Lagrange multiplier is lowered and the previous solution is used as a first guess for the new subproblem (Starck et al., 2004; Elad et al., 2005).”
- Sparse Solution Of Underdetermined Linear Equations By Stagewise Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (2006, methodology): “x0 represents the synthesis coecients of a signal is assumed to be sparsely represented from terms in an overcomplete expansion; those terms are the columns of . The sparsity allows to recover a unique representation using only a few terms, despite the fact that representation is in general nonuniqu”
- Why Simple Shrinkage Is Still Relevant for Redundant Representations? (2006, methodology): “We intend to minimize f(x) = 1 2 kx yk22 + 1 T fWxg: (2) In our notations, ( ) is an arbitrary scalar function.”
- Morphological Component Analysis: An Adaptive Thresholding Strategy (2007, background): “In practice, hard thresholding leads generally to better results [ 1 ], [2].”
- The Undecimated Wavelet Decomposition and its Reconstruction (2007, methodology): “A full description of MCA is given in [ 10 ].”
- Wavelets, Ridgelets, and Curvelets for Poisson Noise Removal (2008, methodology): “slices . Different digital ridgelet transforms can be derived depending on the choice of both the radon algorithm and the wavelet decomposition [ 46 ].”
- Optimally Tuned Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Compressed Sensing (2009, methodology): “Hence, there is widespread interest in finding fast algorithms that work essentially as well; in particular application work by Starck and coauthors [ 13 ], [14], [32], [35], and by Elad and coauthors [15], [17] has shown that some very simple iterative algorithms can be strikingly successful on ver”
- Cluster-formation in the Rosette molecular cloud at the junctions of filaments (2012, neutral): “Figure 1 (left) shows a curvelet image from a multi-resolutin morphological decomposition (Starck et al. 2004) of the column density map of the Rosette (see Fig.”
- Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms (2006, background): “Soon after their introduction, researchers developed numerical algorithms for their implementation [37, 18], and scientists have started to report on a series of practical successes, see [ 39 , 38, 27, 26, 20] for example.”
- Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ1 Minimization (2007, background): “When � is redundant, (18) involves fewer unknowns than (17) and may be computationally simpler to solve [ 53 ].”
- Fast Solution of $\ell _{1}$ -Norm Minimization Problems When the Solution May Be Sparse (2008, methodology): “In the belief that true ‘1 minimization is far too slow for large-scale applications, numerous authors have explored approximate algorithms based on iterative thresholding or similar ideas; examples include [23, 11, 48, 49 , 25]; related ideas include projection onto convex sets [6].”