Producer Dynamics: New Evidence from Micro Data: Importers, Exporters and Multinationals: A Portrait of Firms in the U.S. that Trade Goods
By Andrew B. Bernard, J. B. Jensen, Peter K. Schott. 2009
491 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7e5b40f903d5f51b8d2c73468ea19a23c4ec3fc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrew B. Bernard
- In Song Kim
- Ilke Van Beveren
- J. B. Jensen
- Mirabelle Muûls
- Hiroyuki Kasahara
- Peter K. Schott
- Stefano Federico
Citations in the corpus
- The Extensive Margin of Exporting Products: A Firm-Level Analysis (2010, unknown): “introduce local product appeal shocks (similar to Eaton, Kortum and Kramarz 2011) and thus nest a version of the Bernard et al. (2011, henceforth BRS) model that attributes within-firm product heterogeneity to local demand shocks. In our framework, the firm faces two extensive margins and one intens”
- Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI: A productivity comparison at the firm level (2007, background): “2 See Bernard et al. (2005), Brainard (1997), Girma et al. (2005), Head and Ries (2003), and Helpman et al. (2004), for example.”
- Productivity and the Decision to Import and Export: Theory and Evidence (2008, methodology): “Modifying the revenue functions and the intermediate demand functions to include measurement error and a time trend, we use equations (3), (6), and (7) to specify the logarithm of observed total revenue, export intensity, and import intensity as:”
- Carry-Along Trade (2012, background): “…constructing measures of firm-level productivity, see Foster, Haltiwanger, and Syverson (2008) for comparisons of quantity and revenue-based TFP and de Loecker (2011) and Bernard, Redding and Schott (2009) for some of the difficulties in constructing productivity measures for multi-product firms.”
- The Charmed Life of Superstar Exporters: Survey Evidence on Firms and Trade Policy (2017, background): “While not the focus of the theoretical development here, these differences of course provide alternative explanations for why larger firms might support trade liberalization since globalization of the supply chain is only available to the largest firms (Antras and Helpman 2004; Bernard et al. 2009; ”
- Imports and Exports at the Level of the Firm: Evidence from Belgium (2009, background): “1 Bernard and Jensen (1995) for the US and Eaton, Kor tum and Kramarz (2004) for France, using comparabl e data sets in terms of coverage, find that only a minority of manufacturing firms (15 percent in US and 17 percen t in France) export.”
- The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade (2012, methodology): “Bernard et al. (2009b) use U.S. transaction-level data to compare the role of the extensive and intensive margins in accounting for cross-section and time-series patterns of trade.”
- Firms in International Trade: Importers and Exporters Heterogeneity in the Italian Manufacturing Industry (2008, unknown): “According to Muuls and Pisu (2007), Belgian internationalized manufacturing firms on average exported 12 products and imported 34 products, while Bernard et al. (2005) report that in 2000 on average exporters 14The high degree of concentration is broadly confirmed in 1997, although one can observe…”