On-body localization of wearable devices: An investigation of position-aware activity recognition
By Timo Sztyler, Heiner Stuckenschmidt. 2016
399 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- Joaquín B. Ordieres Meré
- Meiqing Wang
- Md Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan
- Archan Misra
- Xiaochen Zheng
- Nirmalya Roy
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Nicholas Donald Lane
- Joaquín B. Ordieres Meré
- Meiqing Wang
- Md Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan
- Archan Misra
- Xiaochen Zheng
- Nirmalya Roy
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Kyungbok Min
- Nicholas Donald Lane
- Joaquín B. Ordieres Meré
- Hanxiang Wang
- Meiqing Wang
- Cheol Hee Lee
- Md Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan
- Archan Misra
Citations in the corpus
- Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Framework (2020, methodology): “We used the RealWorld dataset (Sztyler & Stuckenschmidt, 2016) consisting of time-series data from accelerometer and gyroscope sensors on mobile devices, and partitioned it across 10 mobile clients.”
- Comparison of Data Preprocessing Approaches for Applying Deep Learning to Human Activity Recognition in the Context of Industry 4.0 (2018, methodology): “A segmentation operation is necessary before applying any cla sification method [8].”
- Sensor-based and vision-based human activity recognition: A comprehensive survey (2020, background): “On the other hand, benchmark datasets are often used by the researchers to verify the proposed frameworks [98,99] .”
- UniMiB SHAR: A Dataset for Human Activity Recognition Using Acceleration Data from Smartphones (2016, neutral): “This section describes the method used to acquire and pre-process samples in order to produce the UniMiB SHAR dataset.”
- Scaling Human Activity Recognition via Deep Learning-based Domain Adaptation (2018, methodology): “We observe that HDCNN achieves ≈ 76% and ≈ 73 %classification accuracy, for HHAR and HAR respectively, when adapting across device-instances.”