Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees?
By M. Wilson, Marc D. Hauser, R. Wrangham. 2001
362 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7d18b32c36cae0cd47cd743af7937724a014df7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
- R. Wrangham
- John C. Mitani
- M. Wilson
- Martin N. Muller
- Michael Tomasello
- David P Watts
- Anne Pusey
- Brian Hare
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- R. Wrangham
- John C. Mitani
- Martin N. Muller
- M. Wilson
- David P Watts
- Michael Tomasello
- Anne Pusey
- D. Kitchen
In Social Psychology
- R. Wrangham
- John C. Mitani
- Michael Tomasello
- Martin N. Muller
- M. Wilson
- Brian Hare
- A. Melis
- David P Watts
Citations in the corpus
- Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) modify grouping and vocal behaviour in response to location-specific risk (2007, positive): “8 km2 (Wilson et al., 2001), with night in nests located inside a 15.”
- New Cases of Intergroup Violence Among Chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania (2004, methodology): “Playback experiments simulating intruders support the hypothesis, showing that males are more willing to call toward and to approach a lone male intruder when in parties containing‚3 males than when in parties containing only 1‐2 males ( Wilson et al. 2001 ).”
- INTERGROUP RELATIONS IN CHIMPANZEES (2003, background): “Field experiments have made possible controlled tests of hypotheses that are difficult to test using only observational data (Wilson et al. 2001; I. Herbinger and C. Boesch, submitted manuscript).”
- FACTORS MEDIATING INTER-GROUP ENCOUNTERS IN SAVANNAH BABOONS (PAPIO CYNOCEPHALUS URSINUS) (2004, background): “Hamilton et al., 1975, 1976; Wilson et al., 2001; Kitchen, 2004; reviewed in Cheney, 1987), the relative number of males in opposing groups appeared to play at least some role in the nature of inter-group interactions.”
- Association patterns among wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) reflect sex differences in cooperation (2008, neutral): “On the other hand, Wilson et al. (2001) found no individual differences among males in their tendency to respond aggressively to playbacks of stranger males, a result that does not support the notion that a male’s participation may be contingent upon the presence of a frequent associate.”
- Tactical use of unimodal and bimodal communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) (2004, background): “There are numerous reports of audience effects on communication in a single sensory domain in many vertebrate species (reviewed by Hauser 1996), including apes (e.g. Call &Tomasello1994; Leavens et al. 1996, inpress;Wilson et al. 2001).”
- Vocal, gestural and locomotor responses of wild chimpanzees to familiar and unfamiliar intruders: A playback study (2009, neutral): “In the Kanyawara community of Kibale forest, Uganda, males countercalled to playbacks of male strangers’ pant hoots when their party size was larger than three (Wilson et al. 2001), a group size effect also found in our study.”
- Do male "long-distance calls" function in mate defense? A comparative study of long-distance calls in primates (2002, background): “By combining comparative studies of broad evolutionary patterns with detailed analysis of competing hypotheses within species (e.g., Fashing 2001; Wilson et al. 2001; Wich et al. 2002a b), it should be possible to most thoroughly illuminate the multiple factors that influence the costs and benefit”
- Ecological and social factors affect the occurrence and outcomes of intergroup encounters in chimpanzees (2012, neutral): “Because of strong theoretical (e.g. Wrangham 1999) and experimental (Wilson et al. 2001; Herbinger et al. 2009) evidence that, for chimpanzees, fighting ability and willingness to escalate intergroup contests depend on the number of adult males, we included ‘males’ in all six models.”
- Grouping Patterns and Competition Among Female Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda (2008, neutral): “Using total area used by chimpanzees as a comparative measure of community home range size, the density of adult females at Ngogo is ca. 1.2 females/km2 vs. 0.4 females/km2 at Kanyawara (15–16 adult females, community home range 37.8 km2: Wilson et al. 2001).”
- Correlates of territorial boundary patrol behaviour in wild chimpanzees (2005, background): “Males could reduce these risks by patrolling in relatively large groups (Manson & Wrangham 1991; Wrangham 1999; Wilson et al. 2001; Wilson & Wrangham 2003).”
- Conflict and Cooperation in Wild Chimpanzees (2005, background): “In a series of playbacks, Wilson et al. (2001) showed that male decisions to approach a simulated intruder depended primarily on whether a favorable numerical asymmetry existed.”
- To fight or not to fight: context-dependent interspecific aggression in competing ants (2009, neutral): “de Kort & ten Cate 2001; Wilson et al. 2001; Winfelder 2001; Ord & Evans 2002).”