Evaluating fishery impacts using metrics of community structure

By J. Rice. 2000

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7bc2ec4049ae153f1b38d2a7516b7a7bd980c1a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Changes in the structure and function of the North Sea fish foodweb, 1973–2000, and the impacts of fishing and climate (2005, background): “Introduction The adoption of a more ecological approach to fisheries management requires the development of indicators of the current state of the marine foodweb and the environment, for comparison with baseline values (Murawski, 2000; Rice, 2000).”
Testing candidate indicators to support ecosystem-based management: the power of monitoring surveys to detect temporal trends in fish community metrics (2004, background): “size-structure, diversity, or trophic structure (Rice, 2000; Rochet and Trenkel, 2003; Trenkel and Rochet, 2003).”
Trophodynamic indicators for an ecosystem approach to fisheries (2005, background): “An extensive, though not exhaustive, review found more than 200 different indicators of ecosystem status (Rice, 2000).”
Exploring the effects of fishing on fish assemblages using Abundance Biomass Comparison (ABC) curves (2005, background): “Many indicators have been proposed to capture such effects; all have their own merits and drawbacks based on available scoring criteria ( Rice, 2000, 2003; Rochet and Trenkel, 2003; Rice and Rochet, 2005; Shin et al., 2005).”
Indicators to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries (2005, background): “Indicators support the decision making process by (i) describing the pressures affecting the ecosystem, the state of the ecosystem and the response of managers, (ii) tracking progress towards meeting management objectives and (iii) communicating trends in complex impacts and management processes to ”
Insight into the Trophic Ecology of Yellowfin Tuna, Thunnus albacares, from Compound‐Specific Nitrogen Isotope Analysis of Proteinaceous Amino Acids (2007, background): “There is general agreement of the importance of measuring changes in trophic structure as a means to evaluate fishery impacts on ecosystems, and ecosystem indicators that take trophic level into consideration are desirable (Gislason et al. 2000; Murawski 2000; Rice 2000).”
Definitions of overfishing from an ecosystem perspective (2000, background): “Thus, no consensus has developed on the utility of traditional diversity indices as a measure of ecosystem overfishing (Jennings and Reynolds, 2000; Rice, 2000).”
Testing and recommending methods for fitting size spectra to data (2017, background): “However, uncertainty of slopes has only been occasionally calculated in previous studies (e.g. Rice & Gislason 1996; Graham et al. 2005), a situation that is ‘particularly unsettling’ (Rice 2000).”
Which community indicators can measure the impact of fishing? A review and proposals (2003, background): “The opposite has also been reported to be due to evenness increased by fishing down the most abundant stocks (ICES 1996; Rice 2000) or to improved survey and identification methods (Bianchi et al.”