Biodistribution and toxicity of engineered gold nanoparticles: a review of in vitro and in vivo studies.

By Nikolai G. Khlebtsov, L. Dykman. Chemical Society Reviews, 2011

1,391 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomaterials, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7a69583e74ec340ff0bff34e8b794700af823a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomaterials

1. W. Chan
2. C. Walkey
3. Andrew Emili
4. Jonathan B. Olsen
5. Hongbo Guo
6. C. Murphy

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. C. Walkey
2. W. Chan
3. Andrew Emili
4. Jonathan B. Olsen
5. Hongbo Guo
6. Alaaldin M. Alkilany
7. C. Murphy

In Materials Chemistry

1. C. Walkey
2. Andrew Emili
3. Jonathan B. Olsen
4. Hongbo Guo
5. W. Chan
6. Biqin Dong
7. C. Murphy
8. Alaaldin M. Alkilany

Citations in the corpus

• Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Induce Minimal Phenotypic Changes in a Model Colon Gut Microbiota (2015, neutral): “However, it is important to note that many in vivo studies with higher-level organisms often give mixed results on toxicity (Aillon et al. , 2009; Chen et al. , 2009; Khlebtsov and Dykman, 2011).”
• Novel concept of the smart NIR-light–controlled drug release of black phosphorus nanostructure for cancer therapy (2018, background): “However, most of them are subject to serious limitations such as a weak photothermal conversion efficient, relatively low biosafety and biodegradability, difficulty in metabolizing out of the human body, undegradability, and cytotoxicity that remain a practice challenge for clinical applications (33”