Decision support tools in marine spatial planning: Present applications, gaps and future perspectives

By Kemal Pınarbaşı, I. Galparsoro, Á. Borja, Vanessa Stelzenmüller, C. Ehler, A. Gimpel. 2017

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Evidence-based decision making is an essential process for sustainable, effective, and efficient marine spatial planning (MSP). In that sense, decision support tools (DSTs) could be considered to be the primary assistant of planners. Although there are many DSTs listed in tool databases, most of them are conceptual and not used in real MSP implementation. The main objective of this review is to: (i) characterize and analyse the present use of the DSTs in existing MSP implementation processes around the world, (ii) identify weaknesses and gaps of existing tools, and (iii) propose new functionalities both to improve their feasibility and to promote their application. In total, 34 DSTs have been identified in 28 different MSP initiatives with different levels of complexity, applicability and usage purposes. Main characteristics of the tools were transferred into a DST matrix. It was observed that limited functionality, tool stability, consideration of economic and social decision problems, ease of use, and tool costs could be considered as the main gaps of existing DSTs. Future developments are needed and should be in the direction of the specific need of marine planners and stakeholders. Results revealed that DST developments should consider both spatial and temporal dynamics of the ocean, and new tools should provide multi-functionality and integrity; meanwhile they should be easy to use and freely available. Hence, this research summarised current use, gaps, and expected development trends of DSTs and it concludes that there is still a big potential of DST developments to assist operational MSP processes.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7893b96d06cbedd3dc34e3ec403e3e5d6b986a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. M. Wahl
  2. Vanessa Stelzenmüller
  3. Brian Helmuth
  4. A. D. Mazaris
  5. N. Mieszkowska
  6. Gil Rilov
  7. Stelios Katsanevakis

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. M. Wahl
  2. Vanessa Stelzenmüller
  3. Brian Helmuth
  4. A. D. Mazaris
  5. N. Mieszkowska
  6. Gil Rilov
  7. Stelios Katsanevakis
  8. N. Dulvy

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

  1. Vanessa Stelzenmüller
  2. Stelios Katsanevakis

Citations in the corpus