REIT Organizational Structure and Operating Characteristics

By B. Ambrose, Peter D. Linneman. 2001

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7867044914f182a9ffef2895b1a86278ae45077

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Michael J. Highfield
William G. Hardin
Chinmoy Ghosh
B. Ambrose
C. Sirmans
Matthew D. Hill
G. W. Kelly
Peter D. Linneman

Citations in the corpus

Dynamic Correlations Among Asset Classes: REIT and Stock Returns (2010, unknown): “The results are consistent with Ambrose and Linneman (2001), who suggested that the modern REIT era began with the successful IPOs in late 1991.13 Mean-variance Efficient Portfolio Allocations As noted, investors with an understanding of dynamic asset return correlations could, by adjusting their…”
Real Estate and Economies of Scale: The Case of REITs (2005, methodology): “To gain perspective on the changes in REITs between 1996 (last year in the Ambrose and Linneman (2001) study) and 2001 (the last year of data in this study), we report in Table 1 the descriptive statistics for REIT capitalization, growth prospects, revenue and expense measures, and profitability…”
Insider Ownership and Firm Value: Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts (2006, unknown): “This database has been used in several recent papers, such as Ambrose and Linneman (2001), Ghosh and Sirmans (2003) and Sinai and Gyourko (2000). Most financial and accounting information about REITs are obtained from the SNL REIT DataSource.”
Board Independence, Ownership Structure and Performance: Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts (2003, background): “Ambrose and Linneman (2001) come to similar conclusions.”
The Determinants of REIT Cash Holdings (2009, background): “Building on the results of Capozza and Seguin (2000), Ambrose and Linneman (2001) hypothesize that externally-advised REITs will respond to market pressures and transition to the internal advisement structure because the interests of shareholders and managers are better aligned with the internal adv”