The Effect of Patient Portals on Quality Outcomes and Its Implications to Meaningful Use: A Systematic Review
By C. Kruse, Kathleen Bolton, Greg Freriks. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2015
384 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Background The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act imposes pressure on health care organizations to qualify for “Meaningful Use”. It is assumed that portals should increase patient participation in medical decisions, but whether or not the use of portals improves outcomes remains to be seen. Objective The purpose of this systemic review is to outline and summarize study results on the effect of patient portals on quality, or chronic-condition outcomes as defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and its implications to Meaningful Use since the beginning of 2011. This review updates and builds on the work by Ammenwerth, Schnell-Inderst, and Hoerbst. Methods We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. We identified any data-driven study, quantitative or qualitative, that examined a relationship between patient portals, or patient portal features, and outcomes. We also wanted to relate the findings back to Meaningful Use criteria. Over 4000 articles were screened, and 27 were analyzed and summarized for this systematic review. Results We identified 26 studies and 1 review, and we summarized their findings and applicability to our research question. Very few studies associated use of the patient portal, or its features, to improved outcomes; 37% (10/27) of papers reported improvements in medication adherence, disease awareness, self-management of disease, a decrease of office visits, an increase in preventative medicine, and an increase in extended office visits, at the patient’s request for additional information. The results also show an increase in quality in terms of patient satisfaction and customer retention, but there are weak results on medical outcomes. Conclusions The results of this review demonstrate that more health care organizations today offer features of a patient portal than in the review published in 2011. Articles reviewed rarely analyzed a full patient portal but instead analyzed features of a portal such as secure messaging, as well as disease management and monitoring. The ability of patients to be able to view their health information electronically meets the intent of Meaningful Use, Stage 2 requirements, but the ability to transmit to a third party was not found in the review.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f77f18b5abdd16b7efb12a571b0dae9331b447a7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health Information Management
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of health information technology on patient safety (2017, background): “29 Numerous studies 30-32 have shown that patient portals improve outcomes of preventive care and disease awareness and self-management.”
- Interactive tools for inpatient medication tracking: a multi-phase study with cardiothoracic surgery patients (2016, background): “Finally, we explored patients’ attitudes toward electronic communication about inpatient medication data and use cases, preferences, and concerns related to the handling of inpatient electronic questions and comments, which we expect to be different from electronic messaging through traditional pati”