Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

By A. Einstein, M. Henzlova, S. Rajagopalan. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2007

1,499 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f76fd471076702e9584e1b65bfc6f15b6327f263

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Citations in the corpus

Radiation Dose Associated with Common Computed Tomography Examinations and the Associated Lifetime Attributable Risk of Cancer (2009, neutral): “7-9 55 9 Suspected stroke 87 14 (9-20) 4-56 199 33 Chest Routine chest, no contrast 120 8 (5-11) 2-24 117 20 Routine chest, with contrast 120 8 (5-12) 2-19 119 20 Suspected pulmonary embolism 120 10 (7-14) 2-30 137 23 Coronary angiogram 34 22 (14-24) 7-39 309 51 Abdomen-pelvis Routine abdomen-pelvis”
Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging (2007, background): “Many but not all organizations offering expert opinions maintain that the linear no-threshold model, whereby the risk of cancer proceeds in linear fashion with no lower threshold, provides the most reasonable description of this relationship.(86) A National Academies committee affirming this positio”
Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography (2008, background): “All patients received 80 ml of iopamidol 370 mg I/ml (Isovue370, Bracco Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ) followed by 40 ml normal saline injected with a dual injector (EZEM Empower CTA DUAL Injector, EZEM Inc, Lake Success, NY) at 6 ml per second.”
Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. (2010, background): “Such patients are often young, and female patients are often among those who present with atypical symptoms,(2) so that the radiation exposure associated with coronary CTA is of particular concern.(3) Spiral (also termed”
Projected Cancer Risks From Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007 (2009, neutral): “6 (1) 150 (70-300) 1 30 (10-60) 1 180 (80-400) 1 Otherd 3.”
Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. (2008, background): “Typically, this is done using retrospective gated techniques, so that the dose delivered in other parts of the heart’s cycle is effectively wasted, leading to high organ doses, particularly to the lung and breast [39, 94].”
ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism (2014, background): “breast by CT angiography and the resulting small but significant increase of the lifetime risk of breast cancer.(421) As a rule, a ventilation”
[2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism]. (2014, neutral): “breast by CT angiography and the resulting small but significant increase of the lifetime risk of breast cancer.(421) As a rule, a ventilation”
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. (2014, background): “Pain treatment before consideration of NSAIDs should begin with acetaminophen, nonacetylated salicylates, tramadol, or small doses of narcotics if these medications are not adequate (18, 252).”