Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux

By D. Sifrim, Donald O. Castell, P. Kahrilas. Gut, 2004

853 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gastroenterology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f76c897949d6cc7fa8dd9722eddb12175f279690

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. C. Gyawali
2. P. Kahrilas
3. M. Vaezi
4. E. Savarino
5. A. Bredenoord
6. M. Vela
7. M. Fox
8. F. Zerbib

Citations in the corpus

• Body-mass index and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in women. (2006, neutral): “La prévalence réelle du RGO reste difficile à établir en l’absence de test diagnostique de référence : la pHmétrie a une sensibilité de l’ordre de 60 % chez les malades avec une endoscopie normale [2], la pH-impédancemétrie qui permet de détecter l’ensemble des reflux acides et non acides a probable”
• Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus (2018, methodology): “6 45 However, the added yield is limited, 46 47 the test is not widely available and the interpretation is laborious.”