Stress in youth sport: A developmental investigation of tennis parents

By C. Harwood, Camilla J. Knight. 2009

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Objective This study investigated the stage-specific stressors experienced by British tennis parents whose children were situated either in the sampling, specializing or investment stages of participation in the sport [Cote, J. (1999). The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. The Sport Psychologist, 13 , 395–417]. Design and method A qualitative design was employed with semi-structured interviews conducted with twenty two British tennis parents; six parents representing each of the first two stages of sports participation and ten representing the investment stage. Data was analyzed through a process of inductive content analysis following the method proposed by Miles and Huberman [Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis . London: Sage]. Data matrices were developed for each category of parent to allow for the comparison of the data between themes. Results and conclusion Three general dimensions of parental stressor emerged: Organizational, Competitive and Developmental. Organizational stressors included demands related to finance, time, training and coaching, and governing body systems; competitive stressors related to behavior, performance and morality-related issues associated with their child's matches; and developmental stressors centered on educational issues, uncertainty of tennis transitions, and future decision making. While sampling stage parents encountered few developmental stressors compared to later stage parents, a range of competitive stressors were highly prominent. Organizational stressors were particularly foremost for specializing and investment stage parents. Implications are discussed with reference to further research into the parental stress process and to the importance of stage-specific parent education initiatives.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f74b755daff621fe3a8902237ad734f1783cd832

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. C. Harwood
  2. Camilla J. Knight
  3. M. Drummond
  4. S. Elliott
  5. A. Drew
  6. Travis E Dorsch
  7. N. Holt
  8. N. Clarke

In Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

  1. C. Harwood
  2. Camilla J. Knight
  3. N. Holt
  4. A. Drew
  5. M. Drummond
  6. S. Elliott
  7. Travis E Dorsch
  8. N. Clarke

In Social Psychology

  1. C. Harwood
  2. Camilla J. Knight
  3. M. Drummond
  4. S. Elliott
  5. Travis E Dorsch
  6. N. Holt
  7. A. Drew
  8. N. Clarke

Citations in the corpus