Linearized pipe flow to Reynolds number 10 7
By A. Meseguer, Lloyd N. Trefethen. 2003
221 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f738ef7cf76fbb835ca697c92d85589bfa64eb2b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- B. McKeon
- Ati S. Sharma
- Dwight Barkley
- Rashad Moarref
- Joel A. Tropp
- Tobias M. Schneider
- Bruno Eckhardt
- Holger Faisst
In Environmental Engineering
- B. McKeon
- Ati S. Sharma
- Rashad Moarref
- Joel A. Tropp
- Bruno Eckhardt
- Dwight Barkley
- Holger Faisst
- Jerry Westerweel
Citations in the corpus
- The engine behind (wall) turbulence: perspectives on scale interactions (2017, background): “…resolution must be determined for the Reynolds number under consideration and the wall-normal footprint of uk and f k, 817 P1-24 such that the influence of high shear near the wall is fully captured in converged singular functions (see, for example, Meseguer & Trefethen 2003, for a related study).”
- Theoretical perspective on the route to turbulence in a pipe (2016, methodology): “We know from numerical computations that laminar pipe flow is stable to infinitesimal disturbances (linear stability) to at least Re= 107 (Salwen, Cotton & Grosch 1980; Meseguer & Trefethen 2003).”
- Model-based scaling of the streamwise energy density in high-Reynolds-number turbulent channels (2013, background): “(2.5) McKeon & Sharma (2010) implicitly accounted for the continuity constraint by projecting the velocity field onto the divergence-free basis of Meseguer & Trefethen (2003).”
- A critical-layer framework for turbulent pipe flow (2010, methodology): “For the particular problem under consideration here, the only modification to the linear operator used by Meseguer & Trefethen (2003) is the use of the turbulent mean velocity profile instead of the steady parabolic laminar base flow, as discussed above.”
- Turbulence transition in pipe flow (2007, background): “Pipe flow differs from many other flow situations in that the laminar profile is linearly stable for all Reynolds numbers: All sufficiently small perturbations will decay [see, e.g., Salwen et al. (1980) and, in particular, Meseguer & Trefethen (2003), who analyzed the problem up to Re = 107].”
- Sensitive dependence on initial conditions in transition to turbulence in pipe flow (2003, background): “On the theoretical side, no linear instability could be found (see Schmid & Henningson 1994; Meseguer & Trefethen 2003 and references therein) but analysis of the consequences of the non-normality of the linearized problem has led to the identification of efficient amplification mechanisms that can…”
- On coherent structure in wall turbulence (2013, methodology): “As in McKeon & Sharma (2010), the computational analysis of LK was performed using a modified version of the spectral code of Meseguer & Trefethen (2003).”