The Dataset Nutrition Label (2nd Gen): Leveraging Context to Mitigate Harms in Artificial Intelligence

By Kasia Chmielinski, Sarah Newman, M. Taylor, Joshua Joseph, K. Thomas, Jessica Yurkofsky, Yue Qiu. 2022

74 citations recorded by the source corpus.

As the production of and reliance on datasets to produce automated decision-making systems (ADS) increases, so does the need for processes for evaluating and interrogating the underlying data. After launching the Dataset Nutrition Label in 2018, the Data Nutrition Project has made significant updates to the design and purpose of the Label, and is launching an updated Label in late 2020, which is previewed in this paper. The new Label includes context-specific Use Cases&Alerts presented through an updated design and user interface targeted towards the data scientist profile. This paper discusses the harm and bias from underlying training data that the Label is intended to mitigate, the current state of the work including new datasets being labeled, new and existing challenges, and further directions of the work, as well as Figures previewing the new label.

Subfields: Genetics, Evaluation & Benchmarks, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Hal Daumé Iii

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Jennifer Wortman Vaughan
  2. Jamie H. Morgenstern
  3. Hal Daumé Iii
  4. Hanna M. Wallach
  5. Timnit Gebru
  6. Emily L. Denton
  7. Ana Marasovic
  8. A. Hanna

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Jennifer Wortman Vaughan
  2. Hal Daumé Iii
  3. Hanna M. Wallach
  4. Jamie H. Morgenstern
  5. Timnit Gebru
  6. Emilio Ferrara
  7. Inioluwa Deborah Raji
  8. Su Lin Blodgett

Citations in the corpus