Passive and MR Fluid-coated Auxetic PU Foam – Mechanical, Acoustic, and Electromagnetic Properties

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A review on auxetic structures and polymeric materials (2010, background): “, 2000), fracture toughness (Lakes, 1987; Choi and Lakes, 1996 ), energy absorption (ultrasonic, acoustic, damping) (Scarpa and Smith, 2004; Scarpa et al., 2004a, 2004b), porosity/permeability variation with strain (Alderson et al.”
A state of art on magneto-rheological materials and their potential applications (2018, background): “Scarpa and Smith (2004) at first proposed the idea to use MR foams for active acoustic absorption.”
Auxetic behaviour from connected different-sized squares and rectangles (2011, background): “…resistance (Lakes & Elms 1993; Alderson 1999; Evans & Alderson 2000), enhanced sound and vibration absorption properties (Scarpa & Tomlinson 2000; Scarpa & Smith 2004; Scarpa et al. 2004a,b, 2005) and the ability to form dome-shaped structures (Lakes 1987; Evans et al. 1991; Alderson 1999; Evans…”
Smart metamaterials with tunable auxetic and other properties (2013, unknown): “its infancy [21–29].”
Mechanical properties of 3D re-entrant honeycomb auxetic structures realized via additive manufacturing (2015, background): “In addition, there has generally been a lack of agreement between the experimental results and the theory, which was largely caused by the stochastic nature of the auxetic foams used in the experimentation (Alderson et al., 2005; Bezazi and Scarpa, 2007, 2009; Bianchi et al., 2008; Herakovich, 1984;”