Detectability of extrasolar planets in radial velocity surveys

By A. Cumming. 2004

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Radial velocity surveys are beginning to reach the time baselines required to detect Jupiter analogs, as well as sub-Saturn mass planets in close orbits. Therefore it is important to understand the sensitivity of these surveys at long periods an d low amplitudes. In this paper, I derive analytic expressions for the detectability of plane ts at both short and long periods, for circular and eccentric orbits. In the long period regime, th e scaling of the detection threshold with period depends on the desired detection efficiency. The 99% velocity threshold scales as K / P 2 / a 3 , whereas the 50% velocity threshold scales as K / P / a 3/2 . I suggest an extension of the Lomb-Scargle statistic to Keplerian orbits, and describe how to estimate the false alarm probability associated with a Keplerian fit. I us e this Keplerian periodogram to investigate the effect of eccentricity on detectability. A t short periods, detectability is reduced for eccentric orbits, mainly due to the sparse sampling of th e periastron passage, whereas long period orbits are easier to detect on average if they are eccentric because of the steep velocity gradients near periastron. Fitting Keplerian orb its allows the lost sensitivity at short orbital periods to be recovered for e . 0.6, however there remain significant selection effects against eccentric orbits for e & 0.6, and the small number of highly eccentric planets discovered so far may reflect this. Finally, I present a Bayes ian approach to the periodogram which gives a simple derivation of the probability distribu tions of noise powers, clarifies why the periodogram is an appropriate way to search for long period signals, and emphasises the equivalence of periodogram and least squares techniques.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f720d0fde1912fbe7ba7b695948d86b3af7ddba8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. M. Mayor
  2. S. Udry
  3. Gregory Laughlin
  4. J. Southworth
  5. Debra A. Fischer
  6. F. Pepe
  7. D. Queloz
  8. Nuno C. Santos

Citations in the corpus