Determining and visualizing uncertainty in estimates of fiber orientation from diffusion tensor MRI
By Derek K. Jones. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003
412 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f719d66586300949d3893a0b47c6ef9e72017429
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Jacques-Donald Tournier
- Heidi Johansen-Berg
- Alan Connelly
- Daniel C. Alexander
- Alexander Leemans
- Jan Sijbers
- Derek K. Jones
- Fernando Calamante
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Jacques-Donald Tournier
- Alan Connelly
- Heidi Johansen-Berg
- Fernando Calamante
- Alexander Leemans
- Daniel C. Alexander
- Olaf Sporns
- Derek K. Jones
Citations in the corpus
- A modified damped Richardson-Lucy algorithm to reduce isotropic background effects in spherical deconvolution (2010, background): “Compared to DTI, where the variability refers to the orientation of first eigenvector (Jones, 2003), in the SD approach, the estimated variability may be different for each fibre orientation.”
- DTI mapping of human brain connectivity: statistical fibre tracking and virtual dissection (2003, methodology): “The principal eigenvector is also very sensitive to noise, especially in areas of low anisotropy (Jones, 2003).”
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Beyond (2011, positive): “Noise in the DW measurements will inevitably introduce uncertainty in the estimated fiber orientations, which may in turn introduce errors in the delineated pathway (153,154,157,172).”
- NODDI: Practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain (2012, methodology): “4 but plotting the statistics of the estimates of mean orientation μ, using the 95% cone of uncertainty (Jones, 2003).”
- Effects of diffusion weighting schemes on the reproducibility of DTI-derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5T (2007, methodology): “) which result from the tensor formalism (Batchelor et al., 2003; Hasan et al., 2004; Jones, 2003; Jones and Basser, 2004).”
- About “axial” and “radial” diffusivities (2009, background): “The threshold of 45° was arbitrarily chosen to represent a deviation from coherence that is well above the expected cone of uncertainty of highly anisotropic structures, previously reported as low as 3° in the splenium of the corpus callosum and 10° in the frontal white matter areas (18).”
- Occipito-temporal connections in the human brain. (2003, methodology): “It has been shown that the uncertainty in ®bre orientation is spatially inhomogenous throughout the brain and, even within white matter, varies considerably from point to point (Jones, 2003).”
- Motor and language DTI Fiber Tracking combined with intraoperative subcortical mapping for surgical removal of gliomas (2008, background): “The first one is technical and mainly due to inability of DTI-FT to resolve white matter architecture in areas in which more than one fiber population occupies the same voxel (Jones, 2003; Pierpaoli et al., 1996;Wiegell et al., 2000), as in presence of tumor infiltration.”
- Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging (2003, background): “yi, M yi, M i, [ 14 ] where the parameter set now has six free parameters (, S0, d, f, , ). Each of these parameters is subject to a prior distribution, which are chosen to be noninformative except for where we ensure positivity:”
- Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain (2005, methodology): “To assess the variability of the computed fiber tract orientation , we performed simulations to measure the cone of uncertainty according to Jones et al. (Jones, 2003).”
- White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI (2013, methodology): “using either the repeated samples bootstrap (Jones, 2003; Jones and Pierpaoli, 2005a; Pajevic and Basser, 2003), residual bootstrap (Chung et al.”
- The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study † (2004, methodology): “To characterize the distribution in the eigenvector estimates at each noise-free orientation, the 95% cone of uncertainty (CU) was computed as described elsewhere (15).”
- Atlasing location, asymmetry and inter-subject variability of white matter tracts in the human brain with MR diffusion tractography (2011, positive): “Differences in the age range between studies may also explain some of the differences we found between the post-mortem (Bürgel et al., 2006) and the DTI tractography results (Jones et al., 2006; Verhoeven et al., 2010).”
- Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory (2016, methodology): “In particular, we probe the variability of the principal diffusion peaks ζ i ( x ), i = 1, ···, n in voxel x by means of a coherence metric κ ( x )(Jones, 2003): with β 1 ( x ) ≥ β 2 ( x ) ≥ β 3 ( x ) the eigenvalues of the average dyadic tensor Ξ : [14] and n the number of bootstrap realizations.”