Context dependent effects of ectomycorrhizal species richness on tree seedling productivity

By L. Jonsson, M. Nilsson, David A. Wardle, O. Zackrisson. 2001

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6e64ead48dc55043336f2234d8efbcf81773b6b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited. (2004, background): “Hyphal extensions of mycorrhizal root systems, by contrast, are commonly formed at the expense of root structures ( Jonsson et al., 2001; Lerat et al., 2003).”
Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities at forest edges (2005, background): “Lower diversity of infection (Baxter & Dighton 2001; Jonsson et al. 2001) and shifts in the community composition of fungi (Lilleskov et al. 2002) with distance may influence seedling nutrient uptake and growth, although further work is needed in this area.”
The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. (2008, background): “For instance, Jonsson et al. (2001) observed that effects of fungal diversity were strongest at low nutrient availability, perhaps because different mycorrhizal fungi obtained limiting nutrients from different sources in the soil.”
Socialism in soil? The importance of mycorrhizal fungal networks for facilitation in natural ecosystems (2009, background): “Finally, the effect of mycorrhizal fungi on plant growth is context dependent (Johnson, Graham & Smith 1997; Jonsson et al. 2001).”
Plant-microbe-soil interactions in the rhizosphere: an evolutionary perspective (2009, background): “The AM fungi also increase N nutrition by extending the absorptive zone due to hyphal extensions (Jonsson et al. 2001; Lerat et al. 2003) described as the ‘mycorrhizosphere’.”
Exploring functional definitions of mycorrhizas: Are mycorrhizas always mutualisms? (2004, background): “…positively, with the hypothesis being that association with a number of physiologically diverse fungi will benefit an individual tree by maximizing access to nutrients from a range of soil substrates (Amaranthus and Perry 1994; Hagerman et al. 1999; Baxter and Dighton 2001; Jonsson et al. 2001).”
Biotic interactions and plant invasions. (2006, background): “Recent studies suggest that, in response, introduced populations evolve lower allocation to defences against specialist, but not generalist enemies (Muller-Scharer et al. 2004; Joshi & Vrieling 2005; Stastny et al. 2005).”
Mycorrhizal diversity: Cause and effect? (2005, background): “Jonsson et al. (2001) found increased growth after inoculation with mixtures of up to eight EM fungi, although the results were dependent on host species and substrate fertility.”
Different soil moisture conditions change the outcome of the ectomycorrhizal symbiosis between Rhizopogon species and Pinus muricata (2007, background): “In contrast, in high soil nutrient availability conditions, there are usually no significant differences in the size or nutrient status of ECM and non-mycorrhizal plants (Scheromm et al. 1990; Quoreshi and Timmer 1998; Jonsson et al. 2001).”