Quantitative variation in monoterpenes in four species of conifers
By D. Pureswaran, R. Gries, J. Borden. 2004
94 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6d838eb29da093a1a1ee77cc5f9f8cf07a721fc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- J. Borden
- Jörg Bohlmann
- D. Huber
- D. Pureswaran
- S. Seybold
- Jan-Ching Lee
- A. Graves
- Stuart A. Campbell
In Genetics
In Insect Science
- J. Borden
- Jörg Bohlmann
- D. Huber
- D. Pureswaran
- S. Seybold
- Jan-Ching Lee
- A. Graves
- Stuart A. Campbell
Citations in the corpus
- Primary attraction and kairomonal host discrimination in three species of Dendroctonus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) (2005, methodology): “…profiles of the above conifers and the antennal responses of the three species of beetles to these compounds, revealed no significant qualitative differences either in the chemistry of the four species of conifers or in the beetles’ antennal responses to these compounds (Pureswaran et al., 2004a).”
- Pine monoterpenes and pine bark beetles: a marriage of convenience for defense and chemical communication (2006, background): “…pine, P. contorta murrayana (Balfour) Critchfield, Smith 1964], 2.6% [Rocky Mountain lodgepole pine, P. contorta latifolia (Engelmann) Critchfield, Pureswaran et al. 2004b], 1.9–3.9% (both subspecies of P. contorta, Smith 1983, 2000), and 4.4% (limber pine, P. flexilis James, Zavarin et al.…”