Evolutionary Morphology, Innovation, and the Synthesis of Evolutionary and Developmental Biology
By Alan C. Love. 2003
160 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Geometry and Topology, Paleontology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6d2445a063dd7b898a8f05fec0bee80c830d707
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- Gerd B. Müller
- Paul E. Griffiths
- Ingo Brigandt
- Arley Camargo
- M. Pigliucci
- W. Overton
- Jeff Clune
- Daniel J. Nicholson
In Geometry and Topology
In Paleontology
Citations in the corpus
- Systematics of the Neotropical Genus Leptodactylus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae): Phylogeny, the Relevance of Non-molecular Evidence, and Species Accounts (2014, background): “That is, in terms of biological knowledge, understanding the evolution of the phenotype is at least as intrinsically important as understanding the evolution of the genotype (Love, 2003; Wake et al., 2011), and epistemologically the increased explanatory power that results from including additional”
- The importance of homology for biology and philosophy (2007, methodology): “Evo-devo uses the new techniques of molecular biology, and especially molecular developmental biology, to address questions about the interaction of development and evolution which were once at the heart of the study of evolution but receded into the background with the ‘modern synthesis’ and its em”
- Beyond Reduction and Pluralism: Toward an Epistemology of Explanatory Integration in Biology (2010, background): “In fact, evolutionary developmental biology is often called a ‘synthesis’, both by evo-devo biologists (Gilbert et al., 1996; Wagner and Laubichler, 2004; Wake, 1996) and by philosophers (Love, 2003).”
- Evolution, the Extended Synthesis (2010, background): “As a result, calls for an expansion of the Modern Synthesis framework have intensifi ed (R. L. Carroll 2000; Love 2003a; Kutschera and Niklas 2004; Müller 2007; Pigliucci 2007; Rose and Oakley 2007; S. B. Carroll 2008), prompting further scientifi c debate (Pennisi 2008; Whitfi eld 2008).”
- What, if Anything, Is an Evolutionary Novelty? (2008, background): “Muller and Wagner’s and West-Eberhard’s concepts are best understood within the goal of evo-devo: to explicitly include development in the MS (Love 2003).”