The Economic Significance of National Border Effects
By C. Evans. 2003
271 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6cebf48b6d9afb1e954be997a7ac98d90818bf6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. Novy
- Jeffrey A. Robinson
- Paul Ingram
- Tibor Besedeš
- Thomas J. Prusa
- F. Toubal
- Natalie Chen
- Gabriel Felbermayr
Citations in the corpus
- Global Oil Prices and Local Food Prices: Evidence from East Africa (2016, unknown): “This paper also speaks to broader questions of time-varying market frictions and asymmetric price adjustment (Engel and Rogers 1996, Borenstein et al. 1997, Peltzman 2000, Evans 2003, Anderson and van Wincoop 2004).”
- Product differentiation and duration of US import trade (2006, methodology): “We include an ad valorem measure of transportation costs which we compute as the cif/fob ratio for US imports as reported in Feenstra (1996) and Feenstra et al. (2002). When calculated at the product level this ratio is a reasonable measure for transportation costs (Hummels and Lugovskyy, 2006).”
- The Future of the Apparel and Textile Industries: Prospects and Choices for Public and Private Actors (2006, background): “Anderson and van Wincoop (2004, page 691; see also Coughlin, 2004; Evans, 2003; Evans and Harrigan, 2005) Trade costs consist of transport, border-related, and local distribution costs that stand between foreign suppliers and final users.”
- The Intergovernmental Network of World Trade: IGO Connectedness, Governance, and Embeddedness1 (2005, background): “Here, political-cultural differences make communication and understanding more difficult, the upshot being that many opportunities for international exchange are doubtless missed (Evans 2003).”
- Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes (2008, unknown): “SeeMcCallum(1995)forthestudythattriggeredanextensivedebateonthe role of international borders, as well as Wei (1996), and Anderson and van Wincoop (2003), and Evans (2003).”
- Why Don't Firms Export More? Product Quality and Colombian Plants (2006, background): “10 As is summarized by Evans (2000), “the issue of an appropriate value for the elasticity of substitution between imports and domestic goods is a contentious one.” (f. 23, p. 9) We propose a relatively low elasticity of substitution because only manufacturing products are considered. Hummels (2001)”
- Understanding European Real Exchange Rates (2005, background): “Carolyn L. Evans (2003), for example, shows how a traditional gravity model of trade predicts that bilateral trade flows depend TABLE 6—REGRESSION ESTIMATES i 2 a b i 2 c(1 i) 2xi residuals Year a b c Ra 2 Rd 2 1975 0.083 0.299 0.090 0.433 0.120 (0.006) (0.115) (0.013) 1980 0.099 0.921 0.051 0.291…”
- Differentiated Products and Evasion of Import Tariffs (2007, unknown): “Feenstra, Markusen and Rose (2001) showed that home market effects are more pronounced for differentiated than for homogeneous products, while Evans (2003) found that the higher the degree of product differentiation, the smaller the border effects.”
- Ethnic Networks, Information, and International Trade: Revisiting the Evidence (2009, methodology): “1 Using data for OECD countries, Evans (2003) argues that tariff equivalents implied by R&T are exaggerated.”
- Gravity, trade integration, and heterogeneity across industries (2011, background): “As in previous literature (for instance, Chen, 2004, Evans, 2003, Head and Mayer, 2000, Nitsch, 2000, Wei, 1996), domestic trade for country is given by its gross output in industry , , minus total exports of country to the rest of the world in that industry.”