Tensor Product Structure of Affine Demazure Modules and Limit Constructions

By Ghislain Fourier, P. Littelmann. Nagoya mathematical journal, 2004

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Let g be a simple complex Lie algebra, we denote by ĝ the affine Kac-Moody algebra associated to the extended Dynkin diagram of g. Let Λ0 be the fundamental weight of ĝ corresponding to the additional node of the extended Dynkin diagram. For a dominant integral g-coweight λ∨, the Demazure submodule V_λ∨ (mΛ0) is a g-module. We provide a description of the g-module structure as a tensor product of “smaller” Demazure modules. More precisely, for any partition of λ∨ = λ∑j as a sum of dominant integral g-coweights, the Demazure module is (as g-module) isomorphic to ⊗j V_ (mΛ0). For the “smallest” case, λ∨ = ω∨ a fundamental coweight, we provide for g of classical type a decomposition of V_ω∨(mΛ0) into irreducible g-modules, so this can be viewed as a natural generalization of the decomposition formulas in [13] and [16]. A comparison with the Uq (g)-characters of certain finite dimensional -modules (Kirillov-Reshetikhin-modules) suggests furthermore that all quantized Demazure modules V_λ∨,q(mΛ0) can be naturally endowed with the structure of a -module. We prove, in the classical case (and for a lot of non-classical cases), a conjecture by Kashiwara [10], that the “smallest” Demazure modules are, when viewed as g-modules, isomorphic to some KR-modules. For an integral dominant ĝ-weight Λ let V(Λ) be the corresponding irreducible ĝ-representation. Using the tensor product decomposition for Demazure modules, we give a description of the g-module structure of V(Λ) as a semi-infinite tensor product of finite dimensional g-modules. The case of twisted affine Kac-Moody algebras can be treated in the same way, some details are worked out in the last section.

Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6c16c8197ae1db0d4da64d01ee3a99729eaaa5b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Algebra and Number Theory

  1. R. Venkatesh
  2. Ghislain Fourier
  3. Vyjayanthi Chari
  4. P. Littelmann
  5. D. Hernandez
  6. Michael Lau
  7. Alexander S. Kleshchev
  8. N. Nekrasov

In Geometry and Topology

  1. R. Venkatesh
  2. Ghislain Fourier
  3. Vyjayanthi Chari
  4. P. Littelmann
  5. D. Hernandez
  6. Michael Lau
  7. Alexander S. Kleshchev
  8. N. Nekrasov

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Vyjayanthi Chari
  2. R. Venkatesh
  3. Ghislain Fourier
  4. P. Littelmann
  5. D. Hernandez
  6. Michael Lau
  7. Joel Kamnitzer
  8. Christoph Schwer

Citations in the corpus