Firm Dynamics, Markup Variations, and the Business Cycle

350 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Macroeconomic Fluctuations and Firm Entry: Theory and Evidence (2006, background): “See Bergin and Corsetti (2005), Gertler and Comin (2003) and Jaimovich (2004) for models in which markups depend on the number of competitors.”
Cities, Skills and Regional Change (2014, background): “JAIMOVICH and FLOETOTTO (2008) presented some support for this calibration, which only impacts on the estimated connection between skills and productivity growth.”
Endogenous Market Structures and the Business Cycle (2010, positive): “The temporary reduction of mark ups and increase of real wages induces a stronger intertemporal substitution effect in favour of current consumption and labour supply, which magnifies the effects of the shock compared to a perfectly competitive model a la Kydland and Prescott (1982). Our propagation”
Micro and macro policies in the Keynes+Schumpeter evolutionary models (2016, neutral): “Finally, firms’ bankruptcies are counter-cyclical (Jaimovich and Floetotto 2008, SF16, cf.), and the distribution of firms’ bad debt at bankruptcy follows a power law (SF17), in tune with the empirical evidence (Di Guilmi et al. 2004).”