Life-history traits of introduced Iberian pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus relative to native populations. Can differences explain colonization success?

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Intra‐population variability of life‐history traits and growth during range expansion of the invasive round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (2012, methodology): “Life-history traits in fishes can vary in response to different environments and demographic conditions, as evidenced by differences in life-history traits between native and non-native populations of the same species (MacInnis & Corkum 2000a,b; Fox et al. 2007) and within a single population throug”
Impacts of non-native fishes on Iberian freshwater ichthyofauna: current knowledge and gaps (2010, background): “2002b), but more interestingly if it is compared to their native areas (e.g., Copp et al. 2009; Copp et al. 2004; Domínguez and Pena 1996; Drake et al. 1987; Fernández-Delgado 1989b; Fox et al. 2007; Pou i Rovira 2004; Tomeček et al. 2007; Vila-Gispert et al. 2007; Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich 2000”
Life-history traits and potential invasiveness of introduced pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus populations in northwestern Europe (2009, background): “…and which is typical of many equilibrium strategists has been associated with successful invaders (e.g. Olden et al. 2006; Statzner et al. 2008), even though at least some of these invaders appear to adapt to the novel environment by putting more effort into reproduction (Fox et al. 2007).”