Investigation on the effect of cellulosic nanoparticles’ morphology on the properties of natural rubber based nanocomposites

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Review of the recent developments in cellulose nanocomposite processing (2016, background): “95–575 2010 [64] PVA CNF MCC 5 48% increase in storage modulus 2015[65]”
Nanofibrillated cellulose: surface modification and potential applications (2013, background): “A wide variety of non-woody plant have been studied for the extraction of NFC, including cotton [27], ramie [28], sisal [29], flax [30], abaca [26], wheat straw [31, 32], potato tubers [33], sugar beet pulp [34], banana rachis [35], bagasse [36], palm tree [37] etc.”
Cellulose-Based Bio- and Nanocomposites: A Review (2011, methodology): “Other latexes such as poly(β-hydroxyoctanoate) (PHO) [165–167], polyvinylchloride (PVC) [168–171], waterborne epoxy [172], natural rubber (NR) [122, 173, 174], and polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) [99] were also used as matrix.”
Physicomechanical properties of nanocomposites based on cellulose nanofibre and natural rubber latex (2013, background): “Nanocomposites of natural rubber filled with cellulose fibre were reported by earlier researchers (Bendahou et al. 2010; Siqueira et al. 2011; Visakh et al. 2012).”