An experimental assessment of seed adhesivity on animal furs

By M. Couvreur, B. Vandenberghe, K. Verheyen, Martin Hermy. Seed Science Research, 2004

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f690c1d0423ccc386015d8b3bccac83b063d1e83

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Michael Kleyer
2. Peter Poschlod
3. Eric Garnier
4. Oliver Tackenberg
5. K. Thompson
6. J. M. Groenendael
7. J. H. C. Cornelissen
8. Renée M. Bekker

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. K. Thompson
2. I. Kühn
3. Michael Kleyer
4. Eric Garnier
5. Peter Poschlod
6. S. Klotz
7. W. Ozinga
8. Martin Hermy

Citations in the corpus

• How to predict attachment potential of seeds to sheep and cattle coat from simple morphological seed traits (2005, background): “appendages may even decrease attachment potentials (Couvreur et al. 2004).”
• The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora (2008, background): “One key factor in epizoochory (dispersal by means of seeds attached to external parts of an animal) is the capacity of seeds to remain attached to fur, i.e. the attachment potential (Couvreur et al. 2004; Römermann et al. 2005).”
• Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. (2010, unknown): “…12 0.0018±0.0002 11 21.2±20.4 12 83.3 (68–96) 150 0.532±0.117 1.59±0.20 0.44±0.06 3.72±0.63 12 0.0046±0.0008 12 27.5±18.9 12 96.7 (88–100) 150 0.802±0.123 3.19±0.28 0.67±0.09 4.87±0.77 8 0.0140±0.0007 8 1.4±1.1 8 46.5 (28–60) 100 1.902±0.114 4.18±0.46 2.08±0.19 2.02±0.25 8 0.0599±0.0035 8…”