Nearest Neighbour Classification with Monotonicity Constraints
By Wouter Duivesteijn, Ad Feelders. 2008
95 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Toon Calders
- Andrew Cotter
- Maya R. Gupta
- Indrė Žliobaitė
- Faisal Kamiran
- Sicco Verwer
- Wojtek Moczydlowski
- Alexander Mangylov
Citations in the corpus
- Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination (2011, neutral): “One noteworthy exception is monotone classification [10,18].”
- Three naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification (2010, background): “One noteworthy exception is monotonic classification (Kotlowski et al. 2007; Duivesteijn and Feelders 2008), where the aim is to find a classification that is monotone in a given attribute.”
- Monotonic Calibrated Interpolated Look-Up Tables (2015, background): “Duivesteijn and Feelders (2008) proposed re-labeling samples before applying nearest neighbors based on a monotonicity violation graph with the training examples at the vertices.”
- Comprehensible classification models: a position paper (2014, methodology): “In addition, in [18] the training data is first relabeled to make it monotone, and then a nearest-neighbor algorithm is modified to predict class labels in a way that respects the monotonicity constraints.”
- Discrimination Aware Decision Tree Learning (2010, unknown): “One noteworthy exception is monotonic classification [11, 5], where the aim is to find a classification that is monotone in a given attribute.”
- Discrimination-aware classification (2011, unknown): “One noteworthy exception is monotone classification [30, 53].”