The Horus location determination system

362 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modern WLAN Fingerprinting Indoor Positioning Methods and Deployment Challenges (2016, methodology): “utilizes all (or a subset of) RPs with corresponding weights as follows [98], [99]”
A survey of active and passive indoor localisation systems (2012, background): “More details about the radio propagation indoors can be found in [7,61–64].”
Nuzzer: A Large-Scale Device-Free Passive Localization System for Wireless Environments (2009, methodology): “A passive radio map is similar to the active radio map usually used in device-based active WLAN location determination systems, such as [1], [2], [25].”
Challenges: device-free passive localization for wireless environments (2007, methodology): “We use the same method in the Horus [14, 16–19] active location determination system where we store at each radio map point the signal strength histograms from different APs.”
Electronic frog eye: Counting crowd using WiFi (2014, methodology): “RSS-based approaches can be categorized into the Radio Propagation Model [4], [19] and the Fingerprint Method [20], [21], [5].”
Fusing Similarity-Based Sequence and Dead Reckoning for Indoor Positioning Without Training (2017, neutral): “Finally, we compared our approach to two state-of-the-art fingerprinting-based approaches, i.e., WKNN (weighted k-nearest neighbors) [28] and Horus [29].”