Reshaping european regulatory space: An evolutionary analysis

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Credibility, Complexity and Uncertainty: Explaining the Institutional Independence of 29 EU Agencies (2010, background): “Existing research has shown that EU agencies play an important role in affecting the EU’s regulatory output (Coen and Thatcher 2008; Thatcher and Coen 2008; Gehring and Krapohl 2007; Krapohl 2004).”
Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: towards a Single European Regulatory Space (2011, background): “Bringing together agencies and networks within one framework of analysis demonstrates (a) how agencies replace networks, displaying an evolutionary trajectory of development (Thatcher and Coen 2008) in a process that might best be called the ‘agencification of networks’; (b) how agencies compete wit”
Tradition and innovation: Europe's accumulated executive order (2008, unknown): “Thatcher and Coen (2008) have observed that, over time, networks have become gradually more institutionalised and centralised around EU-level bodies.”
Institutional Layering: A Review of the Use of the Concept (2011, methodology): “After Thelen’s development of the concept we see a proliferation of its use in current literature on institutional change (e.g. Ackrill and Kay, 2006; Béland, 2007; Boas, 2007; Bruszt, 2008; Engelen, 2006; Hacker, 2004; Parker and Parenta, 2008; Thatcher and Coen, 2008).”